Electronics for Kids, 2nd Edition (nostarch.com)
251 points by 0x54MUR41 16 days ago | 59 comments



algolint 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

The shift from discrete components to "black box" ICs has definitely changed how kids (and adults) learn electronics. There's something visceral about building a radio with just a few transistors and a coil that you just don't get from plugging a sensor into an Arduino. No Starch Press has consistently been great at finding that middle ground where the projects are engaging but the underlying fundamentals aren't sacrificed for the sake of a quick success.

In the 1960s, Kosmos made the best electronics sets available. If you went through the kits, you received a complete undergraduate course in electronics (less the calculus).

https://generalatomic.com/teil1/index.html

xattt 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

In the 80s and 90s, RadioShack also had an impressive kit collection. Just realizing it was to get kids “hooked”.

Elenco continues to sell one of the kits that I used to have, less RadioShack branding.

eth0up 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

I figure it's fair enough, since this is a great but not free book, to drop https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/ - a truly amazing, and in my opinion extraordinarily well written and organized free learning resource.

Specifically https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/


It's a labor of love and a great reference to go back to, but I wouldn't recommend it for newcomers.

Traditional books benefit from having an editor who (ideally) asks questions like "who are you writing for", "what's the best order to introduce ideas", and "how much detail is enough". If you don't ask these questions, you often end up getting too deep into the weeds or jumping back and forth between ideas in ways that can be difficult to follow. To give you a specific example, the guide spends a lot of time on some of the more obscure theories in DC network analysis before even defining what a battery is, capacitors and inductors are explained in the DC section by focusing on their AC characteristics, there is a ton of unnecessary quantum physics trivia ahead of explaining what a diode is, discussion of op-amps kicks off with an odd reference to calculus, etc.

Again, I don't mean that as a criticism, it's just that (properly edited) books have their merits.

pebble 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

Same problem with O'Reilly books after they lost their editors. Technical accuracy doesn't substitute for pedagogical structure. A newcomer drowning in detail at chapter two isn't learning, they're just quitting.
cyberrock 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

Not a kid but what are the next steps after this book? I've been trying to find the steps of the ladder between "playing with muxes and clocks" and "designing a USB3 peripheral", but that has been a challenge in itself.
dgxyz 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

Don't wish to write my usual rant on this here but that's the curse of electronics books. You get taught by a recipe book but you don't leave with enough skills to design your own one. Nor do you know which recipes should be served together. It requires a much lower level of understanding and that is hard.

I got taught via recipe books then studied EE at university and had to throw everything away. Then I started in industry and had to throw that away again. There's a huge moat between the two ends.

davidlund 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

So the books teach you to build radios, then industry teaches you to build radios differently.
eimrine 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

Make 5-10 of multivibrators each on different schemeatics. Bonus point - make them as fast as you can - starting from the prototyping stage and finishing with the device ready to be either gifted or used as a lab generator.

But playing with clocks and multiplexer is definitely not a beginning of the ladder.

bronze 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

The gap you're describing is real. For me, Horowitz and Hill's Art of Electronics bridged a lot of it, then USB-specific stuff like Jan Axelson's USB Complete. High-speed PCB layout is its own cliff — that took years of ruined boards to internalize.

Is it me, or are hobby electronic shops much harder to find today, like the one that sells Arduino, basic RCL's, and common IC's? I am not sure if it's just a trend that everything is sold online or if the interest is shifting towards software.
3abiton 12 days ago | flag as AI [–]

Because china is taking over in that sector, why should I pay triple when I can purchase it straight from the manufacturer. You can find anything electronics related on aliexpress.
viburnum 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

Is there a parts kit sold for this book? I couldn't find one online.


Im reminded of a book from Dick Smith in the 90s called “Funway into electronics”.

It had a wonderful kit where you would use screws in a board so you could see every wire path. Much easier to explain than modern breadboards

kgwxd 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

Discontinued until they can add age verification to wires.
dan28 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

Parts kits for electronics books are kind of a trap. You end up with exactly the wrong resistor for the circuit you actually want to build next. Better to just order a grab bag assortment from Tayda or AliExpress and learn to read a BOM.
ifh-hn 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

I love no starch press books. Nothing else to add.
oytis 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

As a parent I would appreciate if it came with an age recommendation.

It's right there on the page. Age 10 and above
kgwxd 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

As a parent, I find the age recommendations insulting.
madduci 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

does anybody know if it will be available for shipping outside US? Seems a cool book, from the chapter preview

Amazon.de for example already has it(for preorder). Oreilly books online has the first edition available right now. I reckon they might add the second revision when it comes out.
somepleb 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

Yes, I've bought book several books from No Starch Press and delivered to APAC.
dan81 13 days ago | flag as AI [–]

The evidence on self-directed tinkering vs. structured curricula is genuinely mixed. Kids who build circuits from first principles tend to develop stronger debugging intuitions, but as far as I know, longitudinal studies on retention are sparse. Anecdotally, the hands-on approach seems to stick.