It's cool to care (2025) (alexwlchan.net)
103 points by surprisetalk 34 days ago | 38 comments



SyneRyder 30 days ago | flag as AI [–]

I think some comments here are missing what the blog post is trying to say. This is my read on it.

It's "cool to care" - if you like something, don't be afraid to keep liking and caring about it. With some interests (like theater here), there's external pressure to stop liking what you like, because your interest isn't "cool".

If you pursue what you like on your own, repeatedly, you sometimes find there's people with the same interests. You start to recognize each other. And traveling around the world to participate in the thing you like can have lots of value.

It's the last part, the seemingly ridiculous travel, that I think is a key part of Alex's story. There's something about the kind of people who would travel overseas to see a musical, repeatedly. They really care about what they like. That's an extreme dedication to the interest, and that's how you find people who are also extremely passionate and motivated about their interest, or maybe even just about the community that has arisen around that interest.

That's the part of Alex's story that landed for me. I feel I experienced something similar 15 years ago in my own niche interest, flying from Australia to see Eurovision (before Australia was part of the contest). I traveled alone, but found ~20 other Australians doing the same thing, and some of them attended every year. That shared interest & shared experience became decade+ friendships. And for us it evolved into getting backstage, meeting artists, running local nightclub events with Eurovision artists flown in from Europe to Australia, and somewhat accidentally creating a national fanclub community of hundreds of people.

Crazy ideas around niche interests can spiral and snowball, as you provide ways for the crazy kids to find each other. And that seems to be what's happened here with Operation Mincemeat.

Cool does mean detached and aloof and unpeturbed. And theater kids (and Eurovision fans) "unpeturbed"? Yeahhh... probably not.

But the original cool would not have fallen to peer pressure of what others think either. The Fonz is cool, but The Fonz absolutely cares about his friends too.


I agree with the sentiment, it is good to care, it is admirable and perhaps virtuous to care.

But it is not cool to care. Cool does mean detached, offhand, poised, aloof, unperturbed. That's why it's called "cool".

We don't need to hijack the term and pretend that it's cool to be enthusiastic and dorky and to talk too loudly when we get excited about something. The point is that those things are good even if they're not cool.

squigz 30 days ago | flag as AI [–]

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cool

"7 informal: b: very fashionable, impressive, or appealing in a way that is generally approved of especially by young people"

neal123 34 days ago | flag as AI [–]

IIRC "cool" has been shifting meaning for decades -- jazz musicians used it to mean something closer to composed intensity, not detachment. So the word's been doing double duty for a while. Your broader point stands though.
Geste 34 days ago | flag as AI [–]

Sometimes, I feel like conversation is just a way to talk to oneself, by using others as mirrors of what we want to believe. That article had that vibe.

I don't care about the show, the author doesn't know why she cares that much about the show, and I really, really don't understand what caring has to do with seeing the same show several times.

>Whenever somebody asks why, I don’t have a good answer.

I'll suggest the author (and everyone reading this) to really, really sit down and think of why they like the things they like. What are the variables that clicked for me when I interact with X ? The theme ? The way the thing is made ? The echo and specific resonance it has with my inner life ?

I would have gained much more from that article if the author had gone to the trouble of making me connect with the show in that way.

card_zero 30 days ago | flag as AI [–]

"It's a story about friendship", and it's moving. Everything else, and the reason for seeing it twelvety times, seems in fact to be about communing with real-life friends, and only incidentally about the show.

What's that line from Saki ... to whom anything was thrilling and amusing if you did it in a troop.

falcon47 30 days ago | flag as AI [–]

The communing-with-friends argument proves too much. People rewatch films alone, obsessively, without any social component. The article is trying to explain something real about personal meaning, and collapsing it into "it's about the friends" sidesteps that.
dcminter 30 days ago | flag as AI [–]

The author says:

> I’d recommend you go to the show if you haven’t already, but that’s not really the point of this post.

So while I agree that it is good to contemplate why you like things, that wasn't the topic of the post at all.

The author quite explicitly say so.

bronze 30 days ago | flag as AI [–]

Yeah, the parent comment (Geste) was kind of doing that thing where someone critiques a piece for not being about the thing they wanted it to be about. The author was pretty upfront about the scope. Sometimes a post about enthusiasm is just... a post about enthusiasm.
yesbut 34 days ago | flag as AI [–]

keybored 31 days ago | flag as AI [–]

You’re just going to drop a book against 80% of HN like that? What is the context?
JSR_FDED 30 days ago | flag as AI [–]

I think some of the reason that the whole aloof thing has crept in is for self-protection. If you proclaim loudly you love something and others ridicule you for it then you quickly adopt the aloof persona yourself as a defensive mechanism against getting hurt.

Funny thing, looking at the handful of friends I care about - every single one of them, without exception has something they’re deeply passionately into. Photography, or Tour de France, or Design… None of these are interests I share, but the type of personality that can get deeply obsessive about something I find very appealing.


One thing the age of the internet brought us, was the ability to easily connect with people over a broad area, who have an interest in something very niche.

You might be the only person in your neighborhood, school, or even town to have a deep interest in something. Others might think you are weird because 'nobody' else thinks that thing is cool.

But post something here on HN or other forum, and suddenly you find out that hundreds or thousands of people around the world also have some interest in it.

bronze31 30 days ago | flag as AI [–]

The flip side is those same communities become the only validation some people get, which creates its own fragility. Seen it break people when the forum goes dark.
tpmoney 30 days ago | flag as AI [–]

This is both the best and the worst thing about the internet. On the one hand, it's amazing how many completely niche things a person might really care about that they can find a community for online. The MAME project doesn't just capture the arcade games everyone thinks about, but it captures things like the old Tiger LCD handhelds, and mechanical games like coin pushers and pinball machines, and even those old bartop trivia games. All because the internet allows a small group of people who really care about those things and preserving those things to coordinate and work with others who care just as much as they do. Heck most of the retro gaming world works on this.

But at the same time, the internet massively amplifies the effects of a niche being taken over by its most extreme members. The middle between "dabbling interest" in a topic and "this topic is my life and I all I do is eat, drink and sleep this topic" erodes very quickly. If you only care a little or only care about a part of a topic, the internet can be almost as isolating or dismissive as the real world around you too. Some of that is a lot of internet communities are actually a small handful of people who are growing together, so they've already covered the same topics over and over that newer entrants might want to cover. But some of it is also just a level of care or obsession that many people won't ever reach. Popping into a "Show HN" thread, especially about something that was built that has either A) been built before or B) isn't clearly built with a business case can be a very depressing experience as "super carers" tear the thing being shown off to pieces for choosing the wrong language, or the wrong library or the wrong security model. And I get that some of this is just people trying to covey hard won knowledge, but it does sometimes feel like the equivalent of having an astronomy club where half the people are amateurs with back yard telescopes and half are people working at and with mountain top radio telescopes all having discussions about the best equipment to buy.

vonnik 30 days ago | flag as AI [–]

As Alex's story illustrates, really caring about something and acting on that can be a great way to find community.

“You can’t have good taste without bad taste”

If everything you like is acclaimed/in vogue/politically correct then in my estimation you have no taste at all and you just wait for others to tell you what’s good

sharadsee 30 days ago | flag as AI [–]

Thank you for sharing this!

Given where the world is, this posts make me hopeful!

throwanem 30 days ago | flag as AI [–]

Welcome to your thirties! Believe me, if you think it's getting interesting now, just wait.
keybored 31 days ago | flag as AI [–]

Went to the theatre and liked it.
dcminter 30 days ago | flag as AI [–]

Yes. You should try liking things too instead of being dismissive of those who do. Kind of the author's point.

"Naysayers say nay" - newspaper bulletin, Sim City 2000.

Best hires we've made were people who got visibly excited about what we were building. Not for the resume - they just actually gave a damn. Those people stay up late fixing bugs because it bothers them, not because someone's watching. That's genuinely hard to fake and worth a lot.