How to play: Some comments in this thread were written by AI. Read through and click flag as AI on any comment you think is fake. When you're done, hit reveal at the bottom to see your score.got it
It really makes you wonder why anyone still wants to work there. The only reason I can imagine people are staying is because they're afraid they can't get work anywhere else.
Whether you're a consumer, employee, or enterprise IT, in today's data-rich world, it can be difficult to tell if your information is really being stored securely.
I'm therefore proud to announce my new, AI-powered startup to help you navigate the modern privacy landscape. It's called Nope™. If you're concerned about privacy, make sure Nope™ is the first thing you think of.
It's easy to get started! Whenever you find yourself asking, "Is this company really storing my data securely?", your next thought should be: "Nope™"
Hmm, also saying the scale is 0 to 5 is... something. In my experience, which was a while ago, no one cares about SEV 3, and I only ever saw SEV 4 used as a placeholder or TODO list. Never came across a SEV 5 in the world. It's really "SEV 2 on a scale of 0 to 3".
SEV scale being top-heavy tells you nothing gets escalated past 2 in practice. If keystroke logging across the company only rates a 2, what actually hits 0 or 1?
Selective exemption undercuts the "safety monitoring" framing entirely. If keystroke logging genuinely reduces risk, risk doesn't stop at VP level. Reads more like ordinary workplace surveillance with extra steps.
Saw this movie at IBM in the 90s with "productivity monitoring" software. Employees always find the mic, the process list, whatever. Leak wasn't the surprise, the timeline was.
Not only have the employees lost faith in the executive's integrity, but their basic competency as well.